So Egypt's crown-prince-apparent has tacitly announced his nomination for the presidency with his proposal for a nuclear Egypt.
Egypt has a history of illegitimate leaders adopting mass-scale projects as a means of carving out a place in history for their own legitimacy (distracting the focus of local public opinion from their misplaced selves onto a major foreign and disapproving power instead, that is).
35-year-old officer Gamal Abdel-Nasser lacked any form of legitimacy after overthrowing not only the constitutional parliament and parties, but also the respected general of the coup.
So he campaigned, a la method explained above, for the grand project of the High Dam, previously studied and rejected by a succession of democratic parliamentary governments. He totally screwed the Egyptian ecology, agricultural black lands and delta coastline and fisheries in the process – not to mention drowned a people's entire ancestral land which also happened to be a huge percentage of scarce Egyptian arable Nile land - but no matter; he got from it what was important to himself, and that is what really matters in the end.
Unlike the historical case of drama and controversy related to the construction of the High Dam however, the United States comes out this time in favour of Jimmy's nuclear proposal and says, "Sure, no problem, we'll even help you out with it"...which kind of ruins the whole rebelliousness part of the project, and makes it seem, well...a little silly?
Then there is the whole speed factor of the matter - why the rush? Gamal announces the nuclear platform last year and then soon after Al Ahram publishes this headline:
Then right after prints this one the following day:
The initial hype eventually followed with official silence, but gave sudden energy and rise to all sorts of empty causes for obscure officials with nothing better on their hands to do:
Ok, personally I am against this nuclear energy business, peaceful as it may be, for some of the following reasons...
- We don't need it first of all; the High Dam generates more electricity than we need, enough that we apparently export electrical power to our neighbors.
- If we are talking alternative energy here, then what country more than Egypt should be using its all-year-round scorching sun to generate solar energy? If we really have 2 billion dollars to spare on one of many nuclear plants, then how cool would it be to use these kinds of funds to prop up Egypt as a pioneer and world leader in developing and using solar technology, for example, as India now is a leader in the field of IT?
And why shouldn't the vast expanses of the Egyptian desert be flanked with windmills left and right to generate even more electricity?
If it is cleaner energy sources than petroleum that we are looking for, Egypt is supposed to have huge reserves of natural gas...why aren't we using this fuel on a wider scale to clean our environment? Why isn't the government even applying simple traffic regulation laws as a first step to clean our extremely polluted environment?
And who is asking for this project anyway?
Egyptians are supposed to be a simple and peaceful people; I don't think we're exactly the nuclear energy-flaunting kind of folks.
So who is this project meant to please? My guess held that only the most insecure and irrelevant of Egypt's politicians will be happy with this project:
Al-Oqsori ran for president on a platform of not only making Egypt a nuclear power, but the regional hub for exporting nuclear technology to the rest of the Arab world. This platform of his gave me good heartfelt laughs afterwards for a long time to come…but even this good humour I am now sadly deprived of when I eventually heard the government's plans to materialize even part of it into a reality.
El-Tagamu's Rifaat el Said has also jumped on the bandwagon at some point, predictably, describing it as a 'positive proposal'.
Is it perhaps the "prestige" of this project that gives it an extra shine as a leadership model of 'dignity and pride' in the wider Arab world? The politicians should focus on their constituencies' domestic interests here, within the Egyptian borders, not beyond.
You've got to admit that the NDP did a pretty good job in the last presidential elections in eliminating any realistic competition to the president by the funny bunch of people they presented to the public as alternative frontrunners. But then, going with the apparent fad of one-upmanship in Egyptian politics, the NDP decided to go on and announce its platform in outdoing the opposition in their proposed policies, which I had previously deemed as stupid.
And not to feel left out by the grand championship of one-upmanships, the few writers of the opposition who actually are vocal about the nuclear proposal object to it not out of infeasibility of concept or disagreement on principle, but do so in the tradition of an annoying housewife heckling an exhausted husband every night: "Ha! So you say you can do it?? Then hurry up and show me what you can do!"
Which kind of puts a damper on any hope that the NDP was maybe reconsidering its nuclear proposal in its relative year of silence since its initial announcement, and shifts it more into a matter of willpower in the style of Abdel-Fattah el-Ossari in his classic film where he insists: "Ana Ragel, we kelmiti matenzelsh el ard aaabadan!"
And step into the fray of domestic housewives are the classic nutjobs like this Avigdor Lieberman character, who most welcomely fills in the empty role of foreign disapproving power while simultaneously throwing any local skeptics into the basket of “defeatists, imperialists and Zionist pigs.”
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how the NDP, and the political landscape in Egypt in general, to be fair, stole my laughter away.
But no matter! Dark comedy always finds a way of seeping into our collective lives as Egyptians…
Guess who's invited himself to dinner; Yevgeny Primakov drops in for a visit to offer his services the very next day after Egypt announces a legislature for its peaceful nuclear energy program. Who but Chernobyl Russia should we entrust in building our safe nuclear reactors?